Showing posts with label Analytics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Analytics. Show all posts
May 20, 2017
A lesson on committment
Jessica Barboza first represented Venezuela at Miss Earth in 2009. She was able to secure a second runner up placement at the end of the pageant. She was then sent at Miss International in 2011 where she finished as first runner up. She now holds the distinction of a very few beauty queen who was able to secure two international placement in two of the biggest pageant to date.
Bruna Zanardo won the third runner up placement at Miss Earth 2016. She resigned three months after to compete for Miss Sao Paolo. She then won first runner up failing to represent her state at Miss Brazil where the winner will be the official representative at Miss Universe.
Lesson learned:
A beauty queen who knows how to value committment go far while those who don't loses everything.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss Earth
,
Miss Universe
May 19, 2017
When Philippines and Puerto Rico meets again
On 11 July 1970, Marisol Maralet of Puerto Rico won the Miss Universe title. She was crowned by outgoing Miss Universe, Gloria Diaz of the Philippines
On 11 November 2014, Valerie Hernandez of Puerto Rico won the Miss International title. She was crowned by outgoing Miss International, Bea Rose Santiago of the Philippines.
On 21 May 1994, Dayanarra Torres of Puerto Rico crowns her successor in the Philippines.
Did you know that,
The Treaty of Paris was signed on 10 December 1898 where Spain renounced all claim to Cuba, ceded Guam and Puerto Rico to the United States, and transferred sovereignty over the Philippines to the United States for $20,000,000 which marks the end of the Spanish-American war.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss International
,
Miss Universe
Miss Big Four 2016
Miss Universe
Miss Universe 2016 kicks off in the Philippines without any hassle
on 30 January 2017. The candidates started arriving in Manila on 13 January
although Miss U.S Virgin Island arrived four days earlier followed by Miss
Brazil and Miss Sierra Leone. Miss Colombia was the last delegate to arrive.
The owners of Miss Universe Organization, IMG/WME almost pulled
out from the Philippines as host after Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte
gave remarks comparing his war against drug to Hitler. The owners of IMG / WME
are Jews thus there is sensitivity when it comes to Holocaust. Although, I
should say that their level of interpretation is primitive because hitting
deliberately the Jews would not even be on Duterte’s agenda because his wife is
a Jew.
Miss France, Iris Mittenaere won the title at the end of the
pageant. Iris was the second delegate from France to win the title since 1953
when Christiane Martel won the same title.
It is apparent that there has been a modification in this year’s
presentation which is somehow tantamount to the selection of the winner.
Some of the observed changes were;
(1) Only 13 semi–finalists were
picked instead of the usual 15 where the 13th girl was a product of
online voting.
(2) The semi–finalist was presented
in group of three during the swimsuit and evening gown competition.
(3) From 13 semi–finalists, it was
cut into 9 to 6 and finally to just 3 finalist.
It was also thought that the interview portion now comprise 60% of
the total scores thus there are a lot of girls who unexpectedly made it as
semi–finalists. Given this development, it is very apparent that there has been
“re–alignment” when it comes to the branding of Miss Universe.
On my point of view, Miss Universe is now solidifying its “Confidently
Beautiful” brand by capitalizing on the achievements or perceived future value
of the candidate and amplifies those achievements through her title. I believe
that they no longer want a candidate who will usually end up as a “model” or an
“actress” thus there is less focus on physical attributes and if the winner was
indeed beautiful then it is just an added bonus. It is also by this branding
calibration that Miss Venezuela failed to make it on this year’s pageant.
Andrea Tovar of Colombia was just lucky enough that Philippines’ Maxine Medina
was poor in communication thus she was able to make it on the Top 3 and she
need to cherish that moment since it may not happen again because of this
“re–branding” of Miss Universe.
I will have to give Miss Universe a four and a half star for its presentation this year. The only thing I don’t agree with the pageant is presenting the semi–finalist in group of three since it tends to limit the space of the candidate to maneuver their move. If the Miss Universe Organization will continue the same type of presentation, they should have at least allowed the “group of three” to strut on that 180 degrees circle if it is the comparison that they are after for.
Miss Earth
The organizers of Miss Earth were able to rebound this year from
their mediocre presentation last year. The production significantly improved
although a lot of fans were disappointed with its online streaming of the
pageant. The “food issue” last year was already resolved and the candidates are
happy with the food they are being served from their hotel host. The stage
significantly improved although it would have been better if they made it “three
dimensional” the way they do at Eurovision contest.
It’s as if the moon and the stars were aligned that a “Latina quartet” got the entire placement in the competition headed by Ecuador’s Katherine Espin who were proclaimed winner that night followed by Michelle Gomez of Colombia. It was a sweet revenge for Stephanie de Zorsi of Venezuela who was not able to compete in 2014 but got the third place this year. It was a back to back 4th runner up position for Brazil on the other hand.
One of the things I like about Miss Earth’s production this year was the fact that they are hiding the translator from the camera which makes them secure from bashing. The purpose of the translator is to translate the answers of the candidates and there is no need for them to be visible on the camera. However, it is apparent from the voice of the translator that they are also nervous. Miss Vietnam would have been able to break the Latina quartet could have been her answer was translated correctly.
Some of the pitfalls from this year’s presentation are the
following:
(1) If last year, it is the cameraman
who fails to make contact with the candidate, it is the candidate who failed to
make contact to the cameraman this year which is apparent during the Evening
gown competition where some of the semi–finalist doesn’t know where to look as
the camera rotate around them.
(2) The cameraman is unaware as to
where the location of the semi–finalist being called. He is just waiting as to
whoever candidate will step down and start to focus on her causing the
embarrassment of Miss Indonesia.
(3) There must be something wrong
with the sound system because some of the semi– finalists were able to hear
their countries being called while others don’t.
These pitfalls can easily be
remedied through vigorous practice. The candidates have a lot of itinerary on their
travels that the schedule might have been tight but that should not be an
excuse for repeated rehearsals.
Imelda Schweighart of the Philippines becomes “uncontrolled”
during the competition. First, there was the issue of asking Miss Austria as to
whether Hitler was born in Austria. While there is nothing wrong about a mere
question, it is irrelevant to the advocacy of the pageant. Second, the issue of
eating the seeds of Rambutan fruit causing stomach discomfort for some of the
candidates who ate it. Third, the issue of the gown made by Leo Almodal that
was supposed to be intended for Imelda but was worn by Katherine Espin of
Ecuador because the gown of the latter was not finished on time. And last, the
deliberate bashing of Imelda towards Katherine about cosmetic surgery.
Again, as I have pointed out last year, there should be a “Code of
Ethics” among candidates that they should be able to abide or otherwise they
will not be allowed to continue on the competition.
Some of the opportunities for Miss Earth are:
(1) Environmental issue has a wide
scope. It can’t be disseminated in just one night. The advocacy is weakly
connecting to the people. Miss Earth should be able to strengthen its brand
through its advocacy. Because of its wide scope, each year there should be a
concentration on a specific theme, it could be “endangered animals” for this
year, “water contamination” the following year, “air pollutants” a year after
and so forth.
(2) The environmental issue should
leave a mark to the audience. Why not a swimsuit competitions wearing the wings
of “endangered species of bird” with slide show about it? How about an evening
gown on an “envisioned perfect Earth” on background? Sometimes thinking outside
the box will do the connection.
(3) I can’t help but to notice that every time a
new winner was being crowned, there is always that frowning “unhappy” candidate
on the background. Are they stressed? Are they sour raping?
(4) Miss Earth and Miss Universe were
held on the same stage but Miss Universe was able to make the location ten
times bigger as viewed on television.
Miss International
Through the years, Miss International sticks to its gala type of
presentation which truly reflects the Japanese prim and proper persona.
The Philippines won its 6th Miss International in the
person of Kylie Verzosa.
Most pageant fans thought that to win the Miss International, the candidate has to be facially beautiful, has good pasarela skills and a terrific background. Some countries has haven’t won the Miss International pageant yet. For India, it is the only missing crown for them to complete the Big 4 crowns and yet despite the fact that they are sending great candidates they still miss the crown.
As I watched through the different editions of the pageant, I came
to realize that the organizers are not just looking for something superficial,
it is more on “consistency” and to what aspect that consistency is, I just keep
that to myself for now.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss Earth
,
Miss International
,
Miss Universe
Post-pageant assessment of Binibining Pilipinas 2016
Jennifer Hammond
Miss Intercontinental
Placement: Top 15
Date / Venue: 16 October / Sri Lanka
Jennifer Hammond opened the pageant season armed with
preparedness. The pressure is there because of the ascending performance of the
Philippines at Miss Intercontinental. She is also the first Binibini to compete
internationally. Most thought that she will already clinch that missing crown
but it didn’t work to her advantage.
During the competition, most Filipino fans already knew
from the start that Jennifer will not be given a fair fight. Every time it was
her turn to be focused, the camera will zoom or pan to the audience giving her
less exposure.
Jennifer was not elected from some “minor pageant” in the
Philippines. She was chosen from Binibining Pilipinas (a national beauty
pageant). During the years when representatives at Miss Intercontinental were
being chosen from other beauty pageant, it was not an anticipated event. It was
only when Binibining Pilipinas got the franchise that it got the momentum.
During the finals night, one of the judges was Miss
Russia who was a previous winner. Miss Italy was still speaking during the
question and answer and Miss Russia already stand up from her chair. During the
swimsuit competition, while the girls are strutting their move, none of the
judges were writing scores which is sort of strange.
Upon Jennifer’s return to the Philippines, she was so
disappointed that she has to temporarily shut down her social media accounts. She
was also absent in some of the “send–off” of her Binibini sister to their
respective competition.
Nicole Cordoves
Miss Grand International
Placement: 1st Runner Up
Date / Venue: 25 October / Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
I was not expecting Nicole to make it at the Top 5
either. The least I’m expecting is a Top 10 finish. I thought that her
performance was mediocre. She does have good communication skills from the fact
that she is a former speech writer for Department of Finance but I feel that
her walk was as if she has just given birth.
Nevertheless, she was able to persuade the judge with her
answer. In fact, her answer is far more superior to the winner given the fact
that the question is a taboo to put it in context. Sex, politics, religion and
race are topics which are considered “taboo” in any conversation.
Although the advocacy of Miss Grand International is
close to impossible, I can say that by far, it is “the most organized” pageant
to date. Some of the practices that I like about this pageant are the: (1)
Pinning of sashes – where candidates don’t just pull their sash on racks but
rather there was a formal ceremony for which at the same time, candidates would
be able to know “who’s who,” (2) “Meet and greet” session – where candidates
will sit down on stage in group of five to introduce themselves. This will help
them overcome their stage freight and at the same time become comfortable with
other candidates and to make friends too.
Filipino fans don’t like the owner of Miss Grand
International yet despite it all; Philippines were given a placement year after
year in the competition.
Kylie Verzosa
Miss International
Placement: Winner
Date / Venue: 27 October / Japan
As I previously mentioned, if Kylie will win the Miss
International crown, she will break the curse of Ateneo graduates for not
placing at Miss International. Kylie’s eye was fixated to the crown. She wants
it badly. Kylie sacrificed her love life in exchange of the crown. And she came
triumphant. She now brought in the 6th Miss International crown for
the Philippines and the 13th crown of Big Four pageant.
Following Kylie’s journey to the crown, it became clear
to me what the organizers of Miss International is looking for to which I will
keep to myself as to what it is. Pageant fans prefer Kylie to clinch the Miss
Universe Philippines sash but after following the journey, I now realize why
BPCI gave her the Binibining Pilipinas International sash instead. And if there
would be no changes on Miss International standards and BPCI will be sending
another competitive girl in 2017, a back to back is not farfetched.
With Kylie’s win, Aces & Queen finally completed all
the “Big 3” crowns only on a span of three years.
Joanna Eden
Miss Supranational
Placement: Top 20
Date / Venue: 02 December / Warsaw, Poland
Pageant fans thought that Joanna Eden was a perfect match
to wear the Philippine sash at Miss Supranational. Most thought that she will
deliver but it was the other way around.
She did perform well during the preliminary rounds but
after she was given the opportunity to proceed further, she seems unfocused,
disconnected and uninterested. She seems to lose her momentum during the finals
night. Her performance during the final show is as if she just would like to
finish the show and go home. It is unknown as to what prompted her to such
performance. Is she missing her boyfriend already? Was she pressured? Was she
affected with bashers? Whatever the reason is, it transpired in her
performance.
Joanna was one of the youngest girls crowned by BPCI. I
feel that she still lacks the emotional maturity to be sent for an
international pageant. Thus, therefore, BPCI should raise the age limit of the
candidates to between 20 to 26 years old. Kylie is right when she advises
future beauty queens to “finish your education first.”
If BPCI will continue to hold the franchise of Miss
Supranational, all the girls they will be sending will end as clappers. After
seeing the last four edition of this pageant, it is a modelling competition
embedded in a beauty pageant context. Thus candidates who should be sent to
this pageant are someone who has previous modelling experience which is the
likes of Kelsi Merritt, Kim Ross Williams or Gwen Ruais.
And this competition should be under the belt of either
Century Tuna Superbods or Miss Bikini International Philippines.
Miss Supranational is the larger and more exclusive
version of Star Search backed in the 90’s for their search for “Female
Spokesmodel.” Janice Dickinson said that to become a “Supermodel,” you have to
pass being a “Runway Model,” “Print Ad Model,” “Commercial Model,” and
“Spokesmodel” for a specific brand. If ANTM is a specialization for “Runway”
and Print Ad” Model then Miss Supranational is a specialization for search for
“Spokesmodel” thus it borderlines a modelling competition. Thus with beauty
camp training girls to become beauty queens and by applying the same approach
for candidates to be sent to Miss Supranational, it will not work! It’s not a “one
size, fits all.”
It is also for the same reason that India won the
competition twice because that is where they are really good at. On the other
hand, it is also for the same reason that they have a hard time clinching the
Miss International (MI) crown because if you will apply the same approach for
MI, it will not work.
Nichole Manalo
Miss Globe
Placement: 3rd Runner Up
Date / Venue: 26 November / Tirana, Albania
It would be biased to write something about a pageant
that I didn’t actually watch. I just checked some of the snippet of the pageant
and it’s not really my cup of tea. Most
Filipinos clamor about the fact that the 3rd runner up title given
to Nichole after two days was just to appease the fans.
The title “Miss Globe” itself was confusing. I was asking
in forums whether this title was the same title won by Maricar Balagtas and
Priscilla Mereilles and I can’t find the exact answer.
There was also the issue of Thailand’s National Director
seating as judge on the competition which most Filipinos thought as a sabotage
towards Miss Philippines which is unsubstantiated.
Maxine Medina
Miss Universe
Placement: Top 6
Date / Venue: 30 January 2017 / Manila, Philippines
Maxine was the last of the Binibini Queens to compete.
When she won the title, it is still unknown that the pageant will be held in
the Philippines.
Maxine gave a good fight for the title; however, her
waterloo which is being unable to organize her thought coherently became a
detrimental factor for her to clinch the crown. The question that was given to
her “What is the most significant change you have seen in the world in the last
10 years?” is already a bonus but she still wasn’t able to give a strong and
coherent answer.
Maxine is a total package. My intuition is that Miss
Universe wanted to give her the crown but they can’t tamper the result because
the answer given by the three finalists was indeed strong and convincing.
Opportunities for improvement:
(1)
Stella Marquez de Araneta should just crown two
titles for her pageant: Miss Universe Philippines and Miss International
Philippines and two runners up. If she would like to keep the other franchise,
she can hand picked out of the runners up or semi–finalist the way Osmel Sousa
is doing at Miss Venezuela pageant. Through this process the runners up would
be able to rejoin again if they wish to. With the current policy, once a
candidate was assigned a title, they wouldn’t be able to join again.
(2)
The age bracket of the candidates should be
adjusted to just the 20 to 25 years old range. Eighteen years old is a legal
age but they are technically still in school at this age. Girls of this age are
still within their teenage years where they have to enjoy life and still figure
out what they really wanted to do. Joanna Eden, at 19, doesn’t have the
emotional maturity yet when she competed in her pageant as I have observed it.
(3)
Boyfriends are disturbance if not a jinx to a
“Filipina” beauty queen. Jamie Herell, Angelia Ong, Pia Wurtzbach and Kylie
Verzosa don’t have a boyfriend when they competed on their pageants thus they
won. When I brought this in one of the pageant forums, one respondent told me
“your theory is irrelevant.” Was it? Then name a Filipina beauty queen who has
a boyfriend who wins a “Big Four” crown? Kylie Verzosa deliberately dropped her
boyfriend to concentrate on her training and she reaps the benefit.
(4)
Binibining Pilipinas should integrate more
challenges in this year’s competition which should include (1) “make–over your
roommate challenge” – where roommates will do the makeup of the other to test
their grooming skills and at the same time a bonding moment for each other and
to test their character too (2) group exercise challenge – where a group of candidate
has to present at least three exercise routines on their fellow candidates (3)
healthy meal challenge – where candidates in group of three will prepare meals
that are exceptionally healthy for the body that are ideal for a beauty queen
(4) reach out challenge – where candidates will spend a day in school or
orphanages to replace teachers in educating young children since educating
young children is not a rocket science anyway (5) woman wellness challenge – where
candidates will be grouped to gather information about health issues that
affects woman in today’s society such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer,
sterility, etc. and present it to their fellow candidates.
All of these challenges will
unmask the true character and qualification of each of the candidates as to who
really deserves the crown. Stash away the talent competition where not
everybody would be able to participate and replace it with these challenges
where there is no excuse not to participate. These challenges will also
comprise twenty percent of their scorecard. So, who says
that becoming a beauty queen is easy?
Labels:
Analytics
How to handle Miss World next time
Every country has their own
fetish or fanaticism and Philippines are of no exemption. If the Britons are
fanatics of football and the Americans are glued to Super Bowl, Filipinos are
dead–serious for beauty pageant in this side of the planet. It is of no wonder
also that most of pageant bloggers are from the Philippines.
Recently, Filipinos flock to
social media to voice their dismay over the result of Miss World 2016.
Filipinos are expecting Catriona Gray to bag the second blue crown. She ended
up as third runner up.
Filipino fans are nitty-gritty
to every detail of the pageant. They will follow every guideline that the
pageant has set forth even if it makes them to the point of being gullible.
Thus if there has been a "tweak" or "misdirection" or
"shady event," expect a bunch of bashers in their "beast
mode" tone in a very unforgiving, intimidating and annoying manner. It's
like denying Jews the existence of Holocaust.
So, how did it all start?
Miss World has a so called
fast track challenge. A "fast track" allows the candidate to secure a
spot as "semi-finalist." Catriona was able to get three out of the
five challenges. Below are the details of the Fast
Track Challenge:
Beauty with a Purpose – It is
a video showcasing the advocacy of the candidate.
Talent Competition – a
presentation as to what other abilities does the candidate has more than just
her pretty face.
Multimedia Award – the
presence of the candidate in social media as well as the vote of supporters
worldwide.
Top Model Challenge – is how
the candidate carries herself to a given wardrobe.
Sports Challenge – showcases
the physical wellness and collaboration of the candidate to team work.
During the Finals night, Miss
World has to cut the Top 20 to Top 10 and it was done in random order where the
chosen candidate has to be interviewed straight on stage which means that she
don't know if it was her turn and as to what question will be ask to her.
Catriona once again survive the Top 10 thus she was able to advance to the Top
5. On the Top 5, the remaining five candidates were asked of a pre-recorded
question by one of the eleven judges. Below is the video of Question and
Answer:
Catriona's answer was
metaphorical because she writes a blog but that doesn't necessarily mean that
she wasn't able to answer the question. The winner is Miss Puerto Rico
(Stephanie del Valle). Stephanie's answer was direct to the point and so as the
answer of Miss Kenya too. Assuming that Stephanie's answer is superior to
Catriona, does Catriona's answer less sensible than the first runner up then?
If Catriona's answer is less sensible than the first runner up, is it also less
sensible than the second runner up? The video speaks the gospel of truth!
Filipino fans are perfectionist in English grammar that is why Philippines have become the "Outsourcing Capital of the World." They could easily spot errors, facial expression, voice tone and content of statements. And for them, the reason you will compete abroad is to win otherwise just stay at home. A competition is not a free paid vacation or to get freebies. That is why if you wear a "Philippine" sash, you have to deliver result and Catriona was able to deliver it beyond the expectation of Filipinos and beyond the guidelines set by the pageant organizers. Thus when the result didn't match with the expectations even if procedures were well followed then justification has to be made and if things are irreversible, expect a great deal of clamor on social media until the dust settles down.
Are Filipino grateful winner
but sore losers? Answer is Yes! The reason why there is “training camp” is to
be able to observe, learn from mistake and modify the next training to achieve
perfection! That’s how it works in the Philippine pageantry!
The reason why a Philippine
candidate is always winning in international pageant is because there is always
a "post–pageant" assessment of candidate (i.e., what went wrong? what
could have been done better next time?). This would then serve as an avenue for
improvement so that the next time another candidate will compete
internationally, all the flaws that was not perceived previously will then be
remedied. In the case of Catriona, what went wrong? What could have been done
better in order for her to clinch the crown?
Joanna Eden didn't win at Miss
Supranational and there are dissatisfied bloggers but it didn't prosper because
most people knew she didn't perform well at the very start. The term that was
used to her was "She was just blending." She was not a stand out thus
her placement was well justified. When Katherine Espin was crowned Miss Earth
in Philippine soil, Filipinos support the decision because even before she set
foot in the Philippines, her Instagram was already being trolled and when she
lay foot on the competition, most Bloggers thought "She's the girl!"
Did Filipinos tolerate the tantrums of Imelda Schweighart during the
competition? Absolutely No!
When Kuh Ledesma sat as judge
at Miss Universe 1991, she was prevented to have any interaction with then Miss
Philippines, Alou Camua. When Manny Pacquiao sat as judge at Miss Universe
2014, MJ Lastimosa didn't advance as finalist. When Lea Salonga sat as judge at
Miss Universe 2012, Shamcey Supsup ends as 3rd Runner Up. Lea even said that
she wanted Shamcey to win but as she puts it, "Miss Angola's answer blew
us away."
When Lorraine Schuck of Carousel Production (Miss Earth) was being set up by a Russian television to let Miss Russia win the competition, she didn't give in to the bribe considering it was in millions of Euro. She also said that she is willing to have the result examined if there is a court order for it but she will not do it for "personal reason" only because it will "expose" the judges. This might be the reason also why they stop flashing the breakdown of score during the competition. Flashback to 1999, Miriam Quiambao received a "2.2" score from one of the judge at Miss Universe and it was easily identified who he was.
Miss Earth and Miss Universe use
an "accounting firm" to tabulate their result for greater
transparency. Miss Earth uses Syccip, Gorres and Velayo (SGV) as its tabulator
while Miss Universe uses Ernst and Young. Notice that during the Miss Earth
announcement of Top 20 the Accounting representative is standing side by side
with the host to make sure that it was not tampered. During the finals night of
Miss World 2016, the host of the show introduced “Blink Forest” as “keeping
tally” of the competition. I don’t know if by introducing the name “Blink
Forest” would technically represent an accounting firm or a private individual
picked in random.
Miss International doesn't
acknowledge the presence of an accounting firm in their competition but you
will always notice that there is one man who is on guard at the back of the
host who is monitoring what they are announcing.
At Miss World, it has always
been the "Morley's" who were announcing the winner. It is unknown
whether they are using an accounting firm to tabulate the result. And if they do
use one, they (Morley's) may have a "veto" power to reverse it (Veto
is a “Latin word” which means “to forbid” or stop an official action). Those
that were elected by the panel of judges doesn't necessarily equates to a winner.
They technically serve as "dummy" then. On the other hand, these judges
will then "moonlight" as "shock absorber" if there has been
a clamor over the final result relieving Julia Morley of any accountability.
Any inconsistencies leading to circumstantial result will now become
infallible. It is also for the same reason that the result is always
"unpredictable."
It is also noticeable that
there have been around three "permanent" judges for several years now
who are unknown how they are designated and there are other two “recurring”
judges. A phenomenon which has been practiced back in the 70's at Miss Universe.
It is also unknown whether these judges were asked to sign a waiver that
prevents them from questioning the final result which assimilates the form of a
“veto power” because if there was indeed a discrepancy then the judges would
have voice it out right away the way Perez Hilton did at Miss Universe 2015.
From the format of the
pageant, it seems like the Morley’s are establishing more like of a “United
Nations Security Council (UNSC)” type of organization. The “permanent members”
of UNSC are United Kingdom, United States, China, France and Russia and they
all have “veto power.” Notice that the judges on the competition originate from
those same countries as UNSC. The only country missing on the panel is France.
The screen shot below is an
article which appears at Washington Post where Julia says that the pageant was
“self–financed” to the tune of $5 million and $6 million from license holders.
And this license holder is the National Directors of participating countries.
There are 117 countries who participated on the pageant and if you will do the
math:
$5,000,000 ÷ 117 = $42,735
In other words, each participating country has to pay this amount just to be able to participate in the said competition even if there is no guarantee that they are going to win. And these include countries like Haiti where it could have been used for other welfare development. Unless otherwise, some National Director was giving more since after all it’s not a “one–size–fits–all.”
Unlike Miss Universe or Miss
Earth where the sponsors are multinational companies, I believe that Miss World
sponsor are wealthy private individual who may or may not have direct say on
the decision making process in the selection of the winner.
Backed in the 80’s, Miss World
was not an anticipated event in the Philippines. In fact, Miss Asia–Pacific was
more popular then. Until a TV actress in the name of Ruffa Gutierrez won as
Second Princess in 1993. That’s when Miss World started to gain momentum in
Philippine air.
Many thought that the Blue
Crown will never land on the head of a Filipina Beauty Queen until Megan Young
won the title in 2013. But what significant event was happening during those
times. For three consecutive years since 2010, the Philippine has been placing
as finalist at Miss Universe and Miss World was no longer on the vocabulary
among bloggers of Philippine pageantry. Putting the Blue Crown on the head of a
Filipina would be the best way to penetrate the Philippines once again.
Liliana Tanoesoedibjo
(National Director of Miss Indonesia) who sat as one of the judges was blamed
for the non–placement of Catriona although it is purely circumstantial. Liliana
was also one of the judges when Megan Young won in 2013. In 2014, Valerie Weigman
lost in the Top 10 where Liliana was not one of the judges. In 2015, she
returned as judge where Hillarie Parungao was part of the Top 10 and recently
Catriona entered the Top 5. Liliana might be the only judge who was pushing for
an Asian girl to dominate the Top 10 and yet she was the one who was serving as
“shock absorber” for all the rants on the net while the real culprit was
enjoying her money!
Filipinos who watch the
pageant live in Maryland comprises the biggest chunk of the audience. It was a
big slap on the face when Catriona was left empty–handed on stage! And since
these audiences are scattered on the auditorium, they witness the different
reactions of their fellow audiences as well as the judging panel. They can
attest that there was indeed something wrong!
Catriona’s defeat at Miss
World is a bitter pill to swallow for now. Bloggers who were once hibernating suddenly
resurrected from their swamp to express their dissatisfaction. While it is
indeed true that there is nothing can be done at present, perhaps, in the
future there will be.
We still need to continue to
participate despite the result. But as I have suggested to MWP, we need to
recycle a “first runner up” on its 2017 edition, the girl from the other training camp. A girl who
previously competed in one of the Big 4 pageant.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss World
October 2, 2016
September 25, 2016
Puerto Rico's Lucky Charm
Actors, actresses, fashion model, singers, fashion designers and former title holders are the most common designations of judges seating at Miss Universe editions. And they are all in favor of Puerto Rico.
It is of no wonder that Puerto Rico only has one runner up.
Oftentimes, It is a make or break for Puerto Rico, the way it is for the Philippines at Miss International.
But Puerto Rican beauty queens are very territorial, the five queens who clinch the title are all crowned in locations where there is a large presence of "Latin community."
Except in 1993 and 2006, Puerto Rico don't share the stage with Colombia and Colombia don't share the stage with Puerto Rico.
When Colombia won in 1958 and 2014, no Puerto Rican is on the semi-finals. Even when Colombia won five times as first runner up at Miss Universe, only in 1993 was the stage shared with Puerto Rico. Paola Turbay was spared from the omen. And in 2006, Alice Panikian was also spared. What is the common denominator between Alice and Paola? They are both of Arab descent and somehow it has a "shielding effect" on them.
This also solidifies the fact that whatever is a "charm" for Puerto Rico is a "jinx" for Colombia.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss International
,
Miss Universe
September 24, 2016
The Jinx around Miss Colombia
If Beauty Queen is a charm for Miss Philippines, it's
actually a jinx for Miss Colombia. Out of the five editions of Miss Universe
where Colombia placed first runner up, four Beauty Queen seats as Judges.
Another jinx for Miss Colombia is the presence of judge
of Oriental origin.
In all five editions, the ultimate jinx is the presence
of Actresses, whether drama actresses or comedy actresses of different race,
it's like an omen for Miss Colombia.
Just when we thought Colombia is perfectly majestic in
evening gown, the fourth jinx that hurdles their winning are the fashion
designers.
And lastly, the venue of the pageant has not been in
favor for Colombian girls. Three out of the five editions were held in Asia.
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss Universe
Philippines: Charms & Jinx
Charms: Miss Universe Titlist
Jinx: Restaurateur & Photographer
Neutralizer: Black Athlete
Labels:
Analytics
,
Miss Universe
September 19, 2016
On Racial purity
In
order to improve the race in Brazil, Cuba, Jamaica, Australia, South Africa,
Argentina and Dominican Republic,
"racial whitening" has been promulgated by the government to
invite Europeans to settle in these countries. It is a deliberate effort to
maintain the dominance of white race. However, this propaganda is to eliminate
the Black race.
Miscegenation
is defined as the interbreeding of people considered to be of different racial
types.
Unlike
the case in South America, miscegenation in the Philippines is a product of
cohabitation or marriage with other nationality. Ten percent of the Philippine
population is outside the Philippines which translate approximately to 10
million. Out of that 10 million living in more than 80 countries in the world,
cohabitation cannot be contained.
In
beauty pageant, every time a "Eurasian" Filipina is being crowned,
there is always a clamor among fan that "she is not pure" as in the
case of Pia Wurtzbach. In 2011 to 2014, Miss World Philippines has always sent
in a delegate of mixed race. Other Filipinos would argue that there is no such
thing as "pure Filipino" because the basis was from the fact that the
"pure Filipinos" are the Negritos or the Aetas. But it’s as if to say
also that the "pure Americans" are the American Indians or the
Mohicans and "pure Australians" are the "Australian
aborigines" if that is the case.
Again,
unlike the case of South America were Europeans are invited for miscegenation
purposes, the result of mixture of race in the Philippines is a result of
exodus of millions of Filipinos in search of greener pasture abroad. It is of
no wonder that for this year, three candidates has Filipino blood in them:
Cloie
Syquia is the daughter of Jenny Syquia (Filipino-American) and Filipino actor
Gabby Concepcion. That makes her 75% Filipino by virtue of genetics (same case
as that of Alden Richards). The Swedish citizenship she has was from his
Swedish stepfather thus to say that she is Swedish-American-Filipino is a
misnomer.
Pauline
Dawson by virtue of her last name, I guess that his father was of White race
and it is her mother who is of Philippine descent which makes her 50% Filipino
by virtue of genetics. This is the same case as Solenn Heusaff.
Audra
Dianne Marie claimed that his grandfather was from the Philippines as evident
on her pictures. That makes her a third generation of Filipino lineage where
the percentage of Filipino genes is reduced to just 25% (the same case as
Enrique Iglesias and Nicole Scherzinger). Audra was first runner up at Miss USA
2014. Although, she was crowned in a separate pageant for Miss World USA, this
is the first time since 1991 that a first runner up from Miss USA pageant will
be sent to Miss World.
Usually,
it is the female who has the propensity to marry other nationality but there
are Filipino males also who are marrying White females as in the case of James
Yap and John Soberano.
With
the advent of internet, it is expected that more inter-marriages is set to come
and hopefully, it is a product of love and not of racial discrimination.
Labels:
Analytics
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
































